If you’ve been working with Policy Governance, you know that Ends policies include three components:
a) intended impact/results/effect/difference; b) for intended recipients/beneficiaries; and c) for an intended worth (cost-benefit or priorities). Measuring the cost-benefit of Ends policies can be challenging, especially for less tangible Ends statements.
You are invited to a hands-on exercise in which the participants at this table will test drive “a method for involving customers in valuing outcomes”: the ValueGame by Peter Scholten. The ValueGame was developed for the community which applies the principles of Social Return on Investment. We’ll make some modifications to the process in the ValueGame as we adapt it for measuring the worth component of less tangible Ends policies.
If you want to be a part of the group that pioneers this method for measuring the worth in Ends policies, join us at this table!